This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skateboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Skateboarding on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkateboardingWikipedia:WikiProject SkateboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skateboardingskateboarding articles
This page seems rather biased. It continually uses positive tones rather than neutral in its wording. I don't know how to request that the page is reviewed, but I think it needs to be. -Alex
I think you could put a template at the top of the article. Here are some examples: WP:TM/D Maybe one of the NPOV ones would work best. Also maybe read this: WP:POVC You could try to edit the page yourself. Steve-g (talk) 10:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote the article because I am a life-long fan of Ty Page. He was mocked in a movie, and I wanted to set the record straight about his accomplishments. All statements in the article are true, cited, and can be verified by third-party and archival media. -- R.S.
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]